Actions
Bug #13000
closed
bhyve sources should reflect license details
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
Difficulty:
Bite-size
Tags:
Gerrit CR:
Description
As described in #12848, changes made to bhyve in illumos are dual licensed under both the upstream BSD license as well as the CDDL. Since that often means adding a CDDL header to already-BSD-licensed files in our repository, we should make it clear in the source what that means. This likely means a README.license in the source directories in question to clarify the situation for readers.
Related issues
Updated by Patrick Mooney 9 months ago
- Related to Bug #12848: Clarify bhyve's dual license added
Updated by Patrick Mooney 9 months ago
- Related to Bug #12853: bhyve manifests should include BSD license added
Updated by Patrick Mooney 9 months ago
This change does not result in any modification to files installed into the proto area or in generated packages. It is simply documentation for those consuming the source code.
Updated by Electric Monk 9 months ago
- Status changed from In Progress to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
git commit ec82ad7502f4abb881c6b3012833e59fd3c24594
commit ec82ad7502f4abb881c6b3012833e59fd3c24594
Author: Patrick Mooney <pmooney@pfmooney.com>
Date: 2020-07-31T19:31:46.000Z
13000 bhyve sources should reflect license details
Reviewed by: Andy Fiddaman <andy@omniosce.org>
Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Actions