Actions
Bug #13953
closedtran_destroy_pkt is presumably not an alternative to itself in tran_setup_pkt(9E)
Start date:
Due date:
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
Difficulty:
Bite-size
Tags:
Gerrit CR:
External Bug:
Description
In tran_setup_pkt(9E)
, we have the following sentence:
The tran_setup_pkt() and tran_destroy_pkt() vectors in the scsi_hba_tran(9S) structure are alternatives to the tran_init_pkt() and tran_destroy_pkt() entry points.
Presumably tran_destroy_pkt()
is not an alternative to itself. This was almost certainly meant to be 'The tran_setup_pkt() and tran_teardown_pkt() vectors in the scsi_hba_tran(9S) ...'.
Updated by Robert Mustacchi almost 2 years ago
- Assignee set to Robert Mustacchi
- % Done changed from 0 to 80
Updated by Robert Mustacchi almost 2 years ago
Tested this by verifying the output in man(1).
Updated by Electric Monk almost 2 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- % Done changed from 80 to 100
git commit dc7739930da754fee6930428942636e4857201e7
commit dc7739930da754fee6930428942636e4857201e7 Author: Robert Mustacchi <rm@fingolfin.org> Date: 2021-08-04T15:42:21.000Z 13953 tran_destroy_pkt is presumably not an alternative to itself in tran_setup_pkt(9E) Reviewed by: Peter Tribble <peter.tribble@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Jason King <jason.brian.king@gmail.com> Reviewed by: Andy Fiddaman <andy@omnios.org> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Actions