open O_NOFOLLOW docs could be clearer
Recently, I was in a conversation where I was trying to determine whether or not use of
O_NOFOLLOW in open would stop one from following an intermediate symlink; however, it doesn't actually. The error for
ELOOP makes that a lot clearer, but that's actually quite buried. We should clarify this in open(2) at least, and perhaps others.
No data to display