Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #2988

closed

nfssrv: need ability to go to submounts for v3 and v2 protocols

Added by Vitaliy Gusev almost 10 years ago. Updated over 2 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Vitaliy Gusev
Category:
nfs - NFS server and client
Start date:
2012-07-10
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:
Medium
Tags:
needs-triage
Gerrit CR:

Description

RFCs of NFSv3,v2 protocols don't have mentions for submounts, but for NFSv4 does.

illumos nfs server doesn't go to submounts automatically. Therefore nfs v2,v3-clients need
to be configured with automounter to use exported submounts.

It can be problematic for some nfs-clients. For instance, ESX-server (it uses nfs v3).

Solution: add option for exported NFS-share: "nohide". If share has this option, this exported sub-share will be seen by NFS v2,v3 clients.

By default "nohide" is off.

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Vitaliy Gusev almost 10 years ago

So admin should do:

share -F nfs -o nohide  {SHARE}
Actions
Copy link
 #2

Updated by Vitaliy Gusev almost 10 years ago

Each resource must be shared.

Example:

zfs set -o sharenfs    pool/dataset
zfs set -o sharenfs=nohide  pool/dataset/subdataset
Actions
Copy link
 #3

Updated by Marcel Telka over 7 years ago

  • Category set to nfs - NFS server and client
Actions
Copy link
 #5

Updated by Yuri Pankov about 7 years ago

Andrew Stormont wrote:

This change should be RTI'd: https://github.com/Nexenta/illumos-nexenta/commit/efbfae72dc9d4466fa85868000ef73bd4081263c

Along with fixes for a lot of mem leaks this commit introduced.

Actions
Copy link
 #6

Updated by Vitaliy Gusev about 7 years ago

Yuri Pankov wrote:

Along with fixes for a lot of mem leaks this commit introduced.

What leaks?

Actions
Copy link
 #8

Updated by Vitaliy Gusev about 7 years ago

Yuri Pankov wrote:

https://github.com/Nexenta/illumos-nexenta/commit/41bdbbaeaed5d6e456b8d42c37b12032cc9fa254

It looks like it is modification of commit 2007c08f9799 "2986 nfs: exi refcounter leak at rfs3_lookup".

So using "nohide" feature requires to take the last sources version.

Actions
Copy link
 #9

Updated by Dan McDonald over 2 years ago

The fix for this is comprised of four fixes from illumos-nexenta:

rb11254 - nfs nohide - "nfssrv: need ability to go to submounts for v3 and v2 protocols"
closes #12112 rb3823 - nfs-nohide: lookup("..") for submount should be correct
NEX-3095 Issues related to NFS nohide
NEX-5196 share_nfs(1M): "nohide" description missing

It has been in production in Nexenta since 2016 or 2017, it seems.

Actions
Copy link
 #10

Updated by Vitaliy Gusev over 2 years ago

Yes, seems it could be upstreamed.

With linux client and its automount it works fine like for nfs4, i.e. no need to specify each exported path manually.

Actions
Copy link
 #11

Updated by Vitaliy Gusev over 2 years ago

One of setup was a VMware ESX server and bsros NFS server. Testing cases included
1. Create dataset 'data/b', all was shared and 'data/b' shared with nohide
1. Setup NFS datastore and specify data as NFS share .
2. Create VMs in 'data/b' and start VMs, stop VMs, susped VMs, start "fio".

Actions
Copy link
 #12

Updated by Electric Monk over 2 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed
  • % Done changed from 0 to 100

git commit f7db5903887928b2b43995473632ef63d130bbd4

commit  f7db5903887928b2b43995473632ef63d130bbd4
Author: Vitaliy Gusev <gusev.vitaliy@nexenta.com>
Date:   2019-11-27T19:57:21.000Z

    2988 nfssrv: need ability to go to submounts for v3 and v2 protocols
    Portions contributed by: Marcel Telka <marcel.telka@nexenta.com>
    Portions contributed by: Jean McCormack <jean.mccormack@nexenta.com>
    Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <yuri.pankov@nexenta.com>
    Reviewed by: Alek Pinchuk <alek.pinchuk@nexenta.com>
    Reviewed by: Dan Fields <dan.fields@nexenta.com>
    Reviewed by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
    Approved by: Garrett D'Amore <garrett@damore.org>

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF