Project

General

Profile

Bug #485

Issue permissions are quirky

Added by Matt Lewandowsky almost 9 years ago. Updated 11 months ago.

Status:
Resolved
Priority:
Normal
Target version:
-
Start date:
2010-12-08
Due date:
% Done:

50%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:
Tags:

Description

Developers should have (mostly) a superset of issue tracker features of those of reporters. Likewise with reporters -> non-members -> anonymous.


Related issues

Related to site - Bug #206: Need better bug tracking systemRejected2010-09-15

Actions
Related to site - Feature #442: New Issue should be "available" to unauthenticated usersClosed2010-12-05

Actions
Blocks site - Bug #165: redmine needs to lose its authoritarian streakIn Progress2010-09-07

Actions
Blocked by site - Bug #482: Reporters should be able to define bug dataResolved2010-12-08

Actions

History

#1

Updated by Matt Lewandowsky almost 9 years ago

The following changes to the permissions have been made so far:

Anonymous (not logged in?):
  • No Changes at this time (see #442)
Non-member (logged in but not part of project?):
  • No Changes
  • May want to add Manage issue relations and/or Move issues at some future date
Reporter (has project's Reporter role):
  1. Added Manage issue categories
  2. Added Manage issue relations
  • May want to add Move issues at some future date
Developer (has project's Developer role):
  1. Added Move issues
  2. Added Edit own notes
#2

Updated by Matt Lewandowsky almost 9 years ago

  • Assignee changed from Matt Lewandowsky to Garrett D'Amore

I did the sane things for Reporters and Developers. At this point, we should discuss "non-members" in the context of the thoughts raised in #165 and "anonymous" in the context of both #165 and #442.

It wouldn't hurt reviewing to see if perhaps other permissions should be added, such as allowing reporters to move issues. However, I think things like that should be revisited when people mention them.

#3

Updated by Garrett D'Amore almost 9 years ago

Generally, we need to have a bug-tracking committee that can discuss the workflow here. I'd be happy to sit on that committee to discuss what I think the workflow should be, but I'd like rich lowe, albert lee, and matt to be on the committee to give their thoughts too... I want to have a permission and workflow model that works for everyone if possible. Sergey, can you send out mail about this?

#4

Updated by Piotr Jasiukajtis almost 9 years ago

I'm also unable to:
- change the category (https://www.illumos.org/issues/488)
- change the type (for example from BUG to Feature https://www.illumos.org/issues/461)
- I don't see 'Change properties 'MORE') http://picasaweb.google.com/lh/photo/c6t4Y6eP5SRwVyc3iQBg1Y-Z5KQgf15_rTZ0AHd9fs8?feat=directlink

I use Firefox 3.6.13

#5

Updated by Bryan Horstmann-Allen 11 months ago

  • Status changed from In Progress to Resolved

Also available in: Atom PDF