Project

General

Profile

Actions
Copy link

Bug #6977

closed

ixgb package should not refer to ixgbe's license

Added by Robert Mustacchi about 6 years ago. Updated about 6 years ago.

Status:
Closed
Priority:
Normal
Assignee:
Robert Mustacchi
Category:
-
Start date:
2016-05-16
Due date:
% Done:

100%

Estimated time:
Difficulty:
Bite-size
Tags:
Gerrit CR:

Description

The ixgb package somehow has ended up with a reference to ixgbe's third-party license which is basically an MIT license. However, there's no actual code in the ixgb package as it's a third-party binary. At this point we're suggesting that we remove that reference, as it's pretty hard to see how ixgbe's license could apply to ixgb in this state. This was noticed after 6926 which resulted in having the closed bins upset in certain conditions and no longer finding a similar file in the closed binaries.

Actions
Copy link
 #1

Updated by Electric Monk about 6 years ago

  • Status changed from New to Closed

git commit 591fabec62bd160b1db9b1f20972c9bca1d8a0b6

commit  591fabec62bd160b1db9b1f20972c9bca1d8a0b6
Author: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com>
Date:   2016-05-21T02:01:51.000Z

    6977 ixgb package should not refer to ixgbe's license
    6976 ixgb package should not ship ixgbe's manual page
    Reviewed by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@omniti.com>
    Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com>
    Reviewed by: Dale Ghent <daleg@elemental.org>

Actions
Copy link

Also available in: Atom PDF