c0 controller instance should be reserved for vhci
Apparently the non-predictability of controller numbers assigned by devfsadmd is a PITA when building clustered systems, where it's apparently helpful (or even necessary) that mutli-hosted disks appear with the same device name on both nodes. An obvious solution to that seems to be making sure that disks on scsi_vhci always use c0.
Updated by Electric Monk about 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
- % Done changed from 0 to 100
commit 540b2cc7a3cce4677bb918fec08d34cfd5f8c545 Author: Hans Rosenfeld <email@example.com> Date: 2016-12-20T10:39:27.000Z 7670 c0 controller instance should be reserved for vhci Reviewed by: Dan Fields <firstname.lastname@example.org> Reviewed by: Yuri Pankov <email@example.com> Reviewed by: Igor Kozhukhov <firstname.lastname@example.org> Reviewed by: Sam Zaydel <email@example.com> Reviewed by: Juraj Lutter <firstname.lastname@example.org> Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <email@example.com> Approved by: Robert Mustacchi <firstname.lastname@example.org>