Actions
Bug #8349
closedthrd_equal implements the wrong specification
Start date:
2017-06-05
Due date:
% Done:
100%
Estimated time:
Difficulty:
Medium
Tags:
Gerrit CR:
Description
While implementing thrd_equal(3C), as part of C11, I completely misread the standard. I accidentally reversed the conditions, meaning that 0 was success and non-zero was failure. However, in realize it's the exact opposite. Sigh.
Updated by Electric Monk about 5 years ago
- Status changed from New to Closed
git commit cdcc9e2ce0563ac9f9076ee350d4fd008f61f1eb
commit cdcc9e2ce0563ac9f9076ee350d4fd008f61f1eb Author: Robert Mustacchi <rm@joyent.com> Date: 2017-06-20T15:44:37.000Z 8349 thrd_equal implements the wrong specification Reviewed by: Patrick Mooney <patrick.mooney@joyent.com> Reviewed by: Andy Stormont <astormont@racktopsystems.com> Reviewed by: Toomas Soome <tsoome@me.com> Approved by: Dan McDonald <danmcd@joyent.com>
Actions