ZFS sorted scans

Review Request #1226 - Created Oct. 8, 2018 and updated

Information
Toomas Soome
illumos-gate
1224
97ad0a9...
Reviewers
general
This originated from ZFS On Linux, as https://github.com/zfsonlinux/zfs/commit/d4a72f23863382bdf6d0ae33196f5b5decbc48fd

https://svnweb.freebsd.org/base?view=revision&revision=334844

During scans (scrubs or resilvers), it sorts the blocks in each transaction group by block offset; the result can be a significant improvement. (On my test system just now, which I put some effort to introduce fragmentation into the pool since I set it up yesterday, a scrub went from 1h2m to 33.5m with the changes.) I've seen similar rations on production systems.

FreeNAS has had these changes since Oct 2017.

Scrub & rebuild pools. Note times for performance analysis.

The pools are compatible with systems without the changes, so bouncing back and forth between two versions is possible, and I've used that for correctness-checking.

zpool scrub
zpool offline rpool disk and then later zpool online rpool disk
zpool replace

In my test systems the speedup on phydical disks is very noticeable, 4x 4TB raidz1 (7200RPM WD Black SATA), the scrub/resilver is down to 2 hours from 4 hours (3.5TB allocated data). The virtual disks under vmware fusion (on top of SSD) are not that drastic, but still significant and overall impression is consistent with notes from ZoL and FreeBSD.

Matthew Ahrens
Toomas Soome
Review request changed

Change Summary:

add following patches (as suggested):
a76f3d0437e5e974f0f748f8735af3539443b388: Fix deadlock in IO pipeline
c26cf0966d131b722c32f8ccecfe5791a789d975: Fix zio->io_priority failed (7 < 6) assert

Commit:

-9dd7febf63114d9d3f0fda1820e02f940ce78ab8
+97ad0a9fc7b2f9ea4fa4de58fa23530f1d6b0f0a

Diff:

Revision 2 (+3215 -860)

Show changes

Loading...