7621 Ship usr/include/devfsadm.h to allow externally-built devfsadm modules

Review Request #278 — Created Nov. 26, 2016 and submitted

Information
gwr
illumos-gate
7621
Reviewers
general 
7621 Ship usr/include/devfsadm.h to allow externally-built devfsadm modules
New DRM code.


Might want to check a "pkgsrc" build for unexpected impacts on external packages by this new header.
alp
alp 
  1. Ship It!
  2. 
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  

 
















 





 

  

   




hans




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
hans


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    Ship It!
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 















  2. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  

 
















 





 

  

   




tsoome




   

   







  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
tsoome


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    Ship It!
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    2. 















  2. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  

 
















 





 

  

   




rm




   

   





  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 
rm


    
   


  

  

  



    




  1. 
 
    
  
    
   
    What are the expectations of stability? Presumably we're basically doing this for consolidation-private modules to be built, right? In other words, we will have to coordinate with other consolidations, but we don't consider the interface stable.
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  


    1. 
 
 
      
 
      
  
 
      
 
      
  
      The interfaces used by devlinks modules has not changed in ages, and has a mechanism to support versioning, so we could just as well go with "committed".  However, if we want to keep options open, we could describe it as private/volatile.  I don't have strong feelings about which way it goes.
      
 
      

      2. 


 
    


    

 
    

    2. 















  2. 
 
    
  
    
   
    
  
    
 
    

 
    
  


    
 
    
 
      

  

 
    


    

 
    

    3. 




  

 
















 



 

  

   




gwr




   

   

  

 



 

  


   

   

    
 Review request changed

    
   


  

  

  






 

  Status:
  

  Closed (submitted)

  
 







 


 










  

 









     

    

   

  

  

   
   Loading...